Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines & Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History

Tony wrote:

Hi, guys —

Before I start, I would like to thank you for reading my question.

I have grown up in a Catholic Christian household, and have taken part in Confession, the Eucharist, and other Catholic rituals. One thing has always confused me though:

  • How do we know the events of the Bible actually happened?

Like many parents, mine seem to just believe because the Bible says so and seem to think this is good enough for my siblings and I. They have never discussed anything outside of the Bible to validate the events of the book. It seems I just have to believe in it. This seems to be why many young people are leaving the faith.

Parents cannot validate stories with facts, and that is not good enough for many. So my question is:

  • Is there actually history, outside of the Bible, to suggest the events did happen and are not just tales:

    • of the Resurrection of Jesus?
    • of a time of darkness after Jesus' death?
    • of Mary being a virgin?
    • of the Exodus? etc.

      as many have claimed.

Again thank you so much!


  { How do we know the events of the Bible are not just tales but actually happened and are history? }

Eric replied:


There is evidence outside of Scripture that confirms the Christian faith. However, you have to understand that records, contemporary to Jesus's time, are very fragmentary and few have survived. Remember that the papyrus and parchment, they were written on, only lasted a short time. Without someone to copy them — laboriously, by hand — onto new materials over and over again throughout the centuries, many simply disappeared. We don't have much confirmation of anything that happened during that period. Remember, this was long before the invention of the printing press in the 15th century.

There are several different kinds of evidence that we do have available.

First of all, there are secular references to Christ's existence, for example, in Flavius Josephus (Antiquities of the Jews). Wikipedia (Historicity of Jesus) notes,

"The Roman historian Tacitus, in his Annals (written ca. A.D. 115), book 15, chapter 44., [37] describes Nero's scapegoating of the Christians following the Fire of Rome. He says that their founder was named Christus (the Christian title for Jesus), that he was executed under Pontius Pilate, and that the movement of his followers, initially checked, then broke out again in Judea and even in Rome itself."

If you're merely trying to establish that Christian doctrine was believed by Christians from sources outside the Bible, there are several Christian sources that bear testimony to Christian belief early on. These are often online. See:

. . . and can easily be read. Probably the earliest source is the Didache, or Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (first century). This is a basic manual for a Christian believer and is very valuable as such. It gives, for example, instructions on Baptism.

Another early one, probably before 70 A.D., is the (First) Epistle of St. Clement of Rome to the Corinthians [EWTN][New Advent]. St. Clement, the bishop of Rome (i.e. the pope), rebuked the Corinthians for overthrowing their priests (presbyters).

There is also:

That's just the first century. Even richer are the second century Epistles of St. Ignatius of Antioch (extensive) [EWTN][New Advent] and the Epistle of St. Polycarp of Smyrna to the Philippians.

Also in the second century are the writings of St. Justin Martyr and St. Irenaeus of Lyons. These are theologically much deeper. There is, basically, no lack of testimony from Christians themselves, even testimony contemporary to Scripture. They certainly testify to the Resurrection of Jesus. The fact that a whole lot of people were giving up their lives in the conviction that Jesus rose from the dead is pretty good evidence that He did.

There is no contemporary surviving evidence of the darkness of the Crucifixion, though some have suggested it was symbolic rather than literal. It would not have been a solar eclipse, which would have been impossible at Passover.

As for the virginity of Mary, I don't think that would be a fact likely to be attested to or verified by independent secular sources, although I do find it interesting that traditionally Mary was understood as maintaining her virginal integrity before, during, and after Christ's birth, which would have preserved objective evidence of it. The earliest Christian testimony I can find is in St. Ignatius in A.D. 107:

As for the Exodus, you have to understand that event was four thousand years ago and the chances of finding precise evidence for an event that long ago is pretty slim.

The final kind of evidence for Christian belief is simply to look at the New Testament texts as you'd look at any other historical documents — take them at face value. One interesting thing you notice is that the text does not whitewash the mistakes of the Apostles — they are often portrayed in a fairly negative light. For example, Jesus gets frustrated with them and rebukes them on several occasions. This points to the authenticity of the text — generally if you're making up a text, you make yourself look good, not bad. The gospels are brutally honest (as is the rest of the New Testament).

I would highly recommend for further reading this article:


Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.