Bringing you the "Good News" of Jesus Christ and His Church While PROMOTING CATHOLIC Apologetic Support groups loyal to the Holy Father and Church's magisterium
Home About
AskACatholic.com
What's New? Resources The Church Family Life Mass and
Adoration
Ask A Catholic
Knowledge base
AskACatholic Disclaimer
Search the
AskACatholic Database
Donate and
Support our work
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
New Questions
Cool Catholic Videos
About Saints
Disciplines & Practices for distinct Church seasons
Purgatory and Indulgences
About the Holy Mass
About Mary
Searching and Confused
Contemplating becoming a Catholic or Coming home
Homosexual and Gender Issues
Life and Family
No Salvation Outside the Church
Sacred Scripture
non-Catholic Cults
Justification and Salvation
The Pope and Papacy
The Sacraments
Relationships and Marriage situations
Specific people, organizations and events
back
Doctrine and Teachings
Specific Practices
Church Internals
Church History

Aletha DeMaio wrote:

Hi, guys —

  • What kind of Jew was Jesus in life? a Pharisee, Sadducee, Essene or Zealot?
  • What about His followers?

Since these different groups had different practices and lifestyles, I find this an important cultural question to fully understand the context of Our Savior's Words and Life. For instance, if He were of a group that did not eat animals, that would be important to know.

Also, I have been told that fish in the Bible was likely mistranslated, the Hebrew word is fish weed which translates to sea weed in English. Seaweed being a common food item for travel at the time. Fish would not have kept in the heat and they were traveling so this does not make sense.

  • Is this possibly a mistranslation or do we have a true translation?

Thank you for your time. I can't find answers to these questions anywhere and I have a great love for God and all of his creations and am looking for clarification in this matter.

Aletha

  { What kind of Jew was Jesus: Pharisee, Sadducee, Essene, or Zealot? and is fish mistranslated? }

Eric replied:

Aletha,

To say that Jesus was a Pharisee, Sadducee, Essene, or Zealot implies (to some degree) that He was following someone else.

Jesus did not follow. He led. He created his own branch of Judaism, namely, Christianity.

He could not be a Sadducee because he recognized the entire Tanakh and not just the Torah, and He believed in the Resurrection of the Dead.

He could not be a Zealot because they sought to overthrow the Romans by force, an idea that Jesus manifestly denied and did not teach or represent.

The Essenes had their own community apart from the rest of Judaism, they were sort of like monks; Jesus did not live in such a community or live that way of life so he was not an Essene.

He shared some of the beliefs of the Pharisees and, of those four, that would be the closest. Many of the early Christians were Pharisees, such as Paul (Philippians 3:5, Acts 23:6, Acts 15:5). But Jesus also diverged from the Pharisees of his day and reserved a lot of his venom for them.

Don't listen to those who argue that fish was mistranslated from the Hebrew. First of all, the New Testament was written in Greek, not Hebrew. The meaning of the word is well attested in Greek, and in the context of the many accounts involving fish (see Luke 5:3-11 and Matthew 17:27 in particular).

Eric

Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.